A manipulação de imagens em pesquisa científicas:

Camila Nakamura-Gonino; Gustavo Medeiro de Araújo

doi:10.33361/RPQ.2023.v.11.n.27.606

Authors

Camila Nakamura-Gonino Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2559-9879
Gustavo Medeiro de Araújo Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-6997

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2023.v.11.n.27.606

Keywords:

Scientific images, Image processing, Scientific publication, Ethics

Abstract

This study aimed to map the main actors involved in the discussion about the manipulation of "scientific images". For that, the methodology used included exploratory analysis, bibliographic survey and data extraction. The results indicate that editors/journals and educational/research institutions are the main key players in this scenario and that most of the articles were produced by North American researchers, with the guidelines proposed by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) being the most mentioned. It was observed that, despite the efforts employed, fraudulent image manipulation has been facilitated by the continuous evolution and easy access to new image editing and fabrication tools. In this context, new ethical and technological problems arise, whose confrontation depends, fundamentally, on the mutual collaboration of the actors involved in the scientific publication process, mainly, in the creation of clear guidelines for authors and in the development of new methods and tools for inspection and monitoring of questionable images.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLEA- All European Academies. Código Europeu de Conduta para a Integridade da Investigação. Berlim: ALLEA - All European Academies, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017-Digital_PT.pdf. Acesso em: 05 maio. 2023.

ANSARI, M. D.; GHRERA, S. P.; TYAGI, V. Pixel-Based Image Forgery Detection: A Review. IETE Journal of Education, Londres, v. 55, n. 1, p. 40–46, jan. 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2014.921415. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2014.921415

BECK, T.S. Shaping Images: Scholarly Perspectives on Image Manipulation. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110477092

BECK, T. S. Image manipulation in scholarly publications: are there ways to an automated solution?. Journal Of Documentation, [S.l.], v. 78, n. 5, p. 1184-1198, 7 dez. 2021. Emerald. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2021-0113. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2021-0113

BIK, E. M.; CASADEVALL, A.; FANG, F. C. The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications. Mbio, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. e00809-16, 6 jul. 2016. American Society for Microbiology. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00809-16. Acesso em: 11 jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00809-16

BIK, E. M.; FANG, F. C.; KULLAS, A. L.; DAVIS, R. J.: CASADEVALL, A. Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the molecular and cellular biology experience. Molecular And Cellular Biology, [S.l.], v. 38, n. 20, p. 681-696, 1 out. 2018. Informa UK Limited. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00309-18. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00309-18

BOSCH, X.; HERNÁNDEZ, C.; PERICAS, J.M; DOTI, P.; MARUŠIĆ, A. Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals. PLoS ONE, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 12, e51928, p. 1-9, dez. 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051928. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051928

BREDEKAMP, H.; DÜNKEL, V.; SCHNEIDER, B. (ed.). The technical image: a history of styles in scientific imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226258980.001.0001

BUCCI, E. M. Automatic detection of image manipulations in the biomedical literature article. Cell Death and Disease, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 1-9, 14 mar. 2018. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-0430-3. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-0430-3

CAIRES, L. Nos países desenvolvidos, o dinheiro que financia a ciência na universidade é público. 2019. Disponível em: https://jornal.usp.br/ciencias/nos-paises-desenvolvidos-o-dinheiro-que-financia-a-ciencia-e-publico/. Acesso em: 10 maio 2023.

CANDIDO, J.; LOGUERCIO, R. Q. A ciência e suas imagens: tradução, representação e criação. Policromias – Revista de Estudos do Discurso, Imagem e Som, Rio de Janeiro, v. 5, n. 3, p. 233-255, set./dez. 2020. Disponível em: https://brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/download/157746. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2023.

CAZEAUX, C. The Aesthetics of the Scientific Image. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 187-209, jul. 2015. Informa UK Limited. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2015.1104952. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2015.1104952

CROMEY, D. W. Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images. Science and Engineering Ethics, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 4, p. 639-667, 22 jun. 2010. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9201-y. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9201-y

DORAN, Y. Building knowledge through images in physics. Visual Communication, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 251-277, 8 mar. 2018. SAGE Publications. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759825. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759825

FANELLI, D.; TREGENZA, T. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLOS ONE, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 5, p. 1-11, e5738, 29 maio 2009. Public Library of Science (PLoS). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738. Acesso em: 18 mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738

FANELLI ID, D; SCHLEICHER, F.; FANG, F. C.; CASADEVALL, A.; BIK, E. M. Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications. PLOS ONE, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 3, p. 1-19, e0255334, 2 mar. 2022. Public Library of Science (PLoS). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255334. Acesso em: 18 mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255334

FROW, E. K. Drawing a line: Setting guidelines for digital image processing in scientific journal articles. Social Studies of Science, [S.l.], v. 42, n. 3, p. 369–392, jun. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41721323. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712444303

JAMBOR, H.; ANTONIETTI, A.; ALICEA, B.; AUDISIO, T. L.; AUER, S.; BHARDWAJ, V.; BURGESS, S. J.; FERLING, I.; GAZDA, M. A.; HOEPPNER, L. H.; ILANGOVAN, V.; LO, H.; OLSON, M.; MOHAMED, S. Y.; SARABIPOUR, S.; VARMA, A.; WALAVALKAR, K.; WISSINK, E. M.; WEISSGERBER, T. L. Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications. PLOS Biology, [S.l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 1-25, e300116131, mar. 2021. Public Library of Science (PLoS). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001161. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001161

JORDAN, S. R. Research integrity, image manipulation, and anonymizing photographs in visual social science research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 4, p. 441-454, 23 jan. 2013. Informa UK Limited. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.759333. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.759333

KOPPERS, L.; WORMER, H.; ICKSTADT, K. Towards a Systematic Screening Tool for Quality Assurance and Semiautomatic Fraud Detection for Images in the Life Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, [S.l.], v. 23, n. 4, p. 1113-1128, 15 nov. 2017. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9841-7. Acesso em: 05 maio 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9841-7

LÓPEZ, S. G. Modelos y representaciones visuales en la ciencia. Escritura e Imagen, [S.l.], v. 1, p. 83–116, jan. 2005. Disponível em: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESIM/article/view/ESIM0505110083A. Acesso em: 19 mar. 2023.

LÓPEZ-CÓZAR, E.; SALINAS, D.; LÓPEZ, Á. El fraude en la ciencia: reflexiones a partir del caso Hwang. El Profesional de la Informacion, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 143-150, 1 jan. 2007. Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2007.mar.07. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2007.mar.07

MARCOVICH, A.; SHINN, T. Estrutura e função das imagens na ciência e na arte: entre a síntese e oholismo da forma, da força e da perturbação. Scientiae Studia, São Paulo, v. 9, n. 2, p. 229-265, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ss/a/qcHmmgmQmPjcD3FS3zGf3nH/abstract/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2023.

OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY (ORI). ORI: Promoting integrity in research. Disponível em: https://ori.hhs.gov. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.

PARRISH, D.; NOONAN, Á. B. Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 161-167, 6 jan. 2009. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9108-z. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9108-z

PAUWELS, L. Validating visuals: a socio-semiotic instrument for an informed production and use of visual representations. Social Semiotics, [S.l.], v. 33, n. 2, p. 426-445, 18 jan. 2021. Informa UK Limited. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1874241. Acesso em: 15 maio 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1874241

QI, C.; ZHANG, J.; LUO, P. Emerging Concern of Scientific Fraud: Deep Learning and Image Manipulation. BioRxiv preprint bioRxiv 2020.11.24.395319, p. 1-3, jan. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.24.395319v2. Acesso em: 10 maio. 2023.

REVISTA PESQUISA FAPESP. Mais dinheiro para a ciência nos Estados Unidos. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, São Paulo, v. 303, p. 13, maio. 2021. Disponível em: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/mais-dinheiro-para-a-ciencia-nos-estados-unidos/. Acesso em: 15 maio. 2023.

RICHARDSON, M. K. Heterochrony and the Phylotypic Period. Developmental Biology, [S.l.], v. 172, n. 2, p. 412-421, dez. 1995. Elsevier BV. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1995.8041. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1995.8041

RICHARDSON, M. K.; HANKEN, J.; GOONERATNE, M. L.; PIEAU, C.; RAYNAUD, A.; SELWOOD, L.; WRIGHT, G. M. There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development. Anatomy and Embryology, [S.l.], v. 196, n. 2, p. 91-106, 30 jul. 1997. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004290050082. Acesso em: 01 maio 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004290050082

ROSSNER, M.; YAMADA, K. M. What’s in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation. The Journal of Cell Biology, [S.l.], v. 166, n. 1, p. 11-15, jul. 2004. Rockefeller University Press. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200406019. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200406019

THAKUR, R.; ROHILLA, R. Recent advances in digital image manipulation detection techniques: A brief review. Forensic Science International, [S.l.], v. 312, p. 110311, jul. 2020. Elsevier BV. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110311. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110311

THE JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY. Editorial policies: Data integrity. The Journal of Cell Biology, [S.l.], 2022. ISSN 0021-9525 versão online. Disponível em: https://rupress.org/jcb/pages/editorial-policies#data-integrity. Acesso em: 04 abr. 2022.

TORRES, A. A. L.; MACULAN, B. C. M. D. S. Imagens científicas: organização e representação de imagens para compartilhamento de conhecimento. Múltiplos Olhares em Ciência da Informação, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 2, p.1-10. 2019. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/137076. Acesso em: 10 maio. 2023.

ZHENG, L.; ZHANG, Y.; THING, V. L. L. A survey on image tampering and its detection in real-world photos. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, [S.l.], v. 58, p. 380-399, jan. 2019. Elsevier BV. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.12.022. Acesso em: 25 maio 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.12.022

ZHU, J.; LIU, W. A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, [S.l.], v. 123, n. 1, p. 321-335, 22 fev. 2020. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

ZHUANG, H.; HUANG, T. Y.; ACUNA, D. E. Graphical integrity issues in open access publications: Detection and patterns of proportional ink violations. PLOS Computational Biology, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 12, p. 1-25, e1009650, 13 dez. 2021. Public Library of Science (PLoS). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009650. Acesso em: 06 maio 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009650