Parâmetros da avaliação de desempenho docente no ensino superior: uma metassíntese da literatura

Andréa Oriques Santos; Antonio Cezar  Bornia; Sérgio Murilo Petri

doi:10.33361/RPQ.2026.v.14.n.43.1706

Authors

Andréa Oriques Santos Universidade Federal de santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6909-2490
Antonio Cezar Bornia UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3468-7536
Sérgio Murilo Petri UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-7939

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2026.v.14.n.43.1706

Keywords:

Faculty performance evaluation, Higher education, Qualitative meta-synthesis, Professional development, Evaluative parameters

Abstract

This study aims to identify, select, and assign meanings to the most recurrent parameters of Faculty Performance Evaluation in universities. The central problem lies in the technocratization of faculty performance evaluation, which demands a transition to models that value professional development. Methodologically, the research is qualitative, exploratory, and interpretive, conducted through a meta-synthesis supported by two complementary literature reviews: the first reviewed “good evaluation practices”, such as experiences that prioritize faculty growth; the second deepened the understanding of evaluation systems and investigated the parameters adopted. As a result, an inventory of 90 elements organized into seven dimensions is presented: Teaching, Extension, Research, Management, Functional/Career, Evaluation Perspectives, and Behavioral/Socio-emotional. It can be concluded that the systematization of these parameters allows us to overcome purely productivist views, providing support to initiate a paradigm shift adapted to the institutional and teacher needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Antonio Cezar Bornia, UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina

Antonio Cezar Bornia is a full professor at UFSC (Federal University of Santa Catarina), holding a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Federal University of Paraná and a master's and doctorate in Production Engineering from UFSC. His research focuses on Cost Analysis and Item Response Theory. He is the president of the Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) and the Brazilian Association of Costs (ABC).

Sérgio Murilo Petri, UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina

Sérgio Murilo Petri is an associate professor at UFSC, with a degree in Accounting Sciences (UNIVALI) and a master's and doctorate in Production Engineering (UFSC). He has experience in the areas of Accounting Sciences and Administration, with an emphasis on Organizational Performance Evaluation, and is a member of the Research Group in Public Management and Performance Evaluation.

References

ALARCÓN-QUINAPANTA, M. R.; FREIRE-LESCANO, L. R.; PÉREZ-BARRAL, O.; FRÍAS-JIMÉNEZ, R. A.; NOGUEIRA-RIVERA, D. Medición del rendimiento del talento humano en instituciones de educación superior: producción científica. Ingeniería Industrial, v. 40, p. 24-36, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3604/360458834004/html/.

ARAVENA-GAETE, M.; GAIRÍN SALLÁN, J. Evaluación del desempeño docente: una mirada desde las agencias acreditadoras. Profesorado – Revista de Curriculum y Formacion de Profesorado, v. 25, n. 1, p. 297-317, 2021. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v25i1.8302.

ÁVILA, K. J. L.; MACÍAS, M. R. G.; RODRÍGUEZ, M. M. I.; VIVAS, X. G. La evaluación del profesorado universitario: tendencias en Iberoamérica. Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior, v. 32, n. 1, p. 239-252, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/educacion/cem-2018/cem181w.pdf.

BAS, M. C.; CAROT, J. M. A Model for developing an academic activity index for higher education instructors based on composite indicators. Educational Policy, v. 36, n. 5, p. 1108-1134, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904820951123.

BAUMGARTNER, M.; OESTERHELT, V.; REUKER, S. Development and validation of a multidimensional observation instrument for recording classroom management-related performances of physical education teachers (KlaPe-Sport). German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, v. 50, n. 4, p. 511-522, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-020-00675-6.

BRASIL. Lei nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. Estabelece as diretrizes e bases da educação nacional. Brasília, DF: MEC, 1996. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, Seção 1, p. 27833, 23 dez. 1996.

BRASIL. Lei nº 10.861, de 14 de abril de 2004. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior – Sinaes e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: MEC, 1996. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, Seção 1, p. 3, 15 abr. 2004.

CAI, B.; SHAFAIT, Z.; CHEN, L. Teachers’ adoption of emotions-based learning outcomes: significance of teachers’ competence, creative performance, and university performance. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 13, 812447, p. 1-12, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812447.

CASTRO MORERA, M.; NAVARRO ASENCIO, E.; BLANCO BLANCO, A. La calidad de la docencia percibida por el alumnado y el profesorado universitarios: análisis de la dimensionalidad de un cuestionario de evaluación docente. Educación XX1, v. 23, n. 2, p. 41-65, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.25711.

CHANG, C-M.; LIU, L-W.; HSIEH, H-H.; CHEN, K-C. A multilevel analysis of organizational support on the relationship between person-environment fit and performance of university physical education teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 17, n. 6, 2041, p. 1-17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062041.

DO, A. D.; PHAM, M. T.; DINH, T. H.; NGO, T. C.; LUU, Q. D.; PHAMF, N. T.; HAG, D. L.; VUONGH, H. N. Evaluation of lecturers’ performance using a novel hierarchical multi-criteria model based on an interval complex neutrosophic set. Decision Science Letters, v. 9, n. 2, p. 119-144, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2020.1.003.

FAN, Z.; LIU, J.; YANG, Y. Performance appraisal model for optimizing teacher incentive and constraint mechanisms by random matrix. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, v. 2022, n. 1, e6784543, p. 1-11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6784543.

FU, H.; QI, K. Evaluation model of teachers’ teaching ability based on improved random forest with grey relation projection. Scientific Programming, v. 2022, n. 1, e5793459, p. 1-12, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5793459.

GARCÍA GARCÍA, C.; HERVÁS TORRES, M. Los Sistemas de Evaluación de La Educación Superior En México y España. Un Estudio Comparativo. Revista de La Educación Superior, v. 49, n. 194, p. 113-134, 2020. Disponível em: https://resu.anuies.mx/ojs/index.php/resu/article/view/1127.

GRIBLING, M.; DUBERLEY, J. Global competitive pressures and career ecosystems: contrasting the performance management systems in UK and French business schools. Personnel Review, v. 50 n. 5, p. 1409-1425, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2019-0250.

HENKLAIN, M. H. O.; CARMO, J. S.; HAYDU, V. B.; MUNIZ, M. Teacher behavior checklist content validity according to brazilian teachers and undergraduates. Psico-USF, v. 25, n. 1, p. 171-183, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712020250114.

IQBAL, M. Z.; KÖNINGS, K. D.; AL-ERAKY, M.; ALSHEIKH, M. H.; VAN MERRIENBOER, J. J. G. Development of an entrustable professional activities (EPAs) framework for small group facilitators through a participatory design approach. Medical Education Online, v. 25, n. 1, 1694309, p. 1-10, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1694309.

KOLYCHEV, V. D.; BUDANOV, N. A. Visualization of the processes of performance management and evaluation of the personnel potential of the university. Scientific Visualization, v. 13, n. 5, p. 35-51, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26583/SV.13.5.04.

KOLYCHEV, V.; BUDANOV, N. Student and research and teaching staff engagement as an indicator of corporate culture assessment and a tool for university’s personnel reserve formation. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, v. 31, n. 2, p. 42-57, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-2-42-57.

LIMA, G. A.; CRISTO JÚNIOR, C. H. N.; MOURA, D. L. Mapeando os saberes docentes: uma revisão sistemática da produção acadêmica. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa, São Paulo, v. 13, n. 36, p. 529-549, 2025. http://dx.doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2025.v.13.n.36.839.

LIU, S.; CHEN, Y; SHEN, Q.; GAO, X. Sustainable professional development of german language teachers in china: research assessment and external research funding. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 16, 9910, p. 1-15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169910.

LUDWIKOWSKA, K. Competency-based tests as a tool for teacher evaluation in higher education institutions. Central European Management Journal, v. 30, n. 3, p. 85-111, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.83.

MASTROKOUKOU, S.; KALIRIS, A.; DONCHE, V.; CHAULIAC, M.; KARAGIANNOPOULOU, E.; CHRISTODOULIDES, P.; LONGOBARDI, C. Rediscovering teaching in university: a scoping review of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Frontiers in Education, v. 7, 861458, p. 1-16, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.861458.

MENG, L.; JINLONG, Z.; WANG, L. Classroom teaching performance evaluation model guided by big data and mobile computing. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, v. 2022, n. 1, 2084423, p. 1-9, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2084423.

MULA-FALCÓN, J.; CABALLERO, K. Academics’ perceptions regarding performance evaluations and the consequences for their professional and personal activity. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, v. 17, n. 7, p. 97-113, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2023-0183.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO, A CIÊNCIA E A CULTURA – UNESCO. Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel. Paris: Unesco, 1997. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000160495.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO, A CIÊNCIA E A CULTURA – UNESCO. Comunicado da Conferência Mundial de Educação Superior 2009: As novas dinâmicas do ensino superior e a pesquisa para o progresso social e o desenvolvimento. Paris: Unesco, 2009. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000183277_spa.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO, A CIÊNCIA E A CULTURA – UNESCO. Declaração Mundial sobre Educação Superior no Século XXI: visão e ação, marco referencial de ação prioritária para a mudança e o desenvolvimento da educação superior. Paris: Unesco, 1998. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140457?posInSet=1&queryId=c76a20ed-03d1-46e5-bac1-42e8412f258b.

POPOVIĆ, M.; SAVIĆ, G.; KUZMANOVIĆ, M.; MARTIĆ, M. Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Evaluate Teacher Performance in Higher Education. Symmetry, v. 12, n. 4, 563, p. 1-19, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040563.

PRODANOV, C. C.; FREITAS, E. C. Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. 2. ed. Novo Hamburgo: Editora Feevale, 2013. 276 p. E-book.

ROCHA-VÁZQUEZ, M.; MUR-VILLAR, N.; ALPÍZAR-FERNÁNDEZ, R. Estrategia para la sostenibilidad del claustro en la carrera de medicina. MediSur, v. 17, n. 1, p. 19-31, 2019. Disponível em: https://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/4033.

SÁNCHEZ-ALMEIDA, T. F.; SANDOVAL-PALIS, I. P.; GILAR-CORBI, R.; CASTEJÓN-COSTA, J. L.; SALAZAR-ORELLANA, D. I. Validación del cuestionario de evaluación docente de la escuela politécnica nacional, aplicando el método de análisis factorial con extracción de componentes principale. Ingenieria e Investigacion, v. 40, n. 1, p. 70-77, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.79634.

SANDELOWSKI, M.; BARROSO, J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. 1st ed. New York: Springer, 2007. 312 p.

SUKIRNO, S. Dataset of lecturer performance appraisal. Data in Brief, v. 32, 106161, p. 1-15, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106161.

VAN DIJK, E.; VAN TARTWIJK, J.; VAN DER SHAAF, M. F.; KLUIJTMANS, M. What makes an expert university teacher? A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks for teacher expertise in higher education. Educational Research Review, v. 31, 100365, p. 1-16, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100365.

VÁZQUEZ-SERNA, R.; NAVARRO RANGEL, Y.; VILLEGAS TOVAR, R. Evaluación no autoperceptiva de la competencia informacional docente universitaria: revisión sistemática. Ibersid: revista de sistemas de información y documentación, v. 17, n. 1, p. 89-101, 2023. https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4805.

WALKER, V. S. Tendencias en el campo de la educación superior y su incidencia en el trabajo docente universitario. Revista de la Educación Superior, v. 49, n. 193, p. 107-127, 2020. Disponível em: https://resu.anuies.mx/ojs/index.php/resu/article/view/1028.

WANG, S.; QIU, J.; ZHOU, J.; YU, Y. Evolution and future prospects of education evaluation research in china over the last decade. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 21, 14340, p. 1-14, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114340.

WU, F.; FANG, Y. Multilevel evaluation of teaching quality in higher education using single-valued neutrosophic set. Mobile Information Systems, v. 2022, n. 1, e6217191, p. 1-8, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6217191.

YUAN, W. Research and application of performance pay platform construction for college teaching staff counting and multi-scale feature fusion networks. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377540511_Research_and_Application_of_Performance_Pay_Platform_Construction_for_College_Teaching_Staff_Counting_and_Multi-scale_Feature_Fusion_Networks#fullTextFileContent.

YURÉN, T.; GARCÍA-GARCÍA, F. J.; ESCALANTE FERRER, A. E.; GONZÁLEZ-BARRERA, Z.; VELÁZQUEZ ALBAVERA, D. L. La representación del buen docente universitario entre dos enfoques: transmisivo y constructivista. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, v. 25, n. 85, p. 239-265, 2020. Disponível em: https://ojs.rmie.mx/index.php/rmie/article/view/290.