Ethical dilemmas related to qualitative research in the humanities and social sciences

Authors

  • Dartel Ferrari de Lima Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2021.v.9.n.22.510

Abstract

The regulators of ethical standards in human research used the biomedical research model as a reference. The "exclusivity" assimilated by the model, provoked its meaning: that with the power to exclude. Thus, the system is faced with legitimate problems brought by researchers from the Human and Social Sciences, who seek new knowledge through the use of investigative scenarios different from the biomedical ones. The Brazilian regulatory system, although sensitized to the peculiarities of research methods in the Humanities, still remains distant from harmonizing the wishes, either by the weakness of the norms or by the reluctance to change. The worst-case scenario, which is not expected, but is feared, is to see this regime consolidate with less exercise of ethical wisdom engaged by the researcher in human research. This result would tend to reinforce even more the imposition of new norms, creating a vicious circle, fed by the action of one over the other.

Keywords: Research ethics; Ethics committee; Qualitative research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BATRINCA, B.; TRELEAVEN, P. Social media analytics: a survey of techniques, tools and platforms. AI & Soc, London, v. 30, p. 89–116, 2015. Disponível em: https://silo.tips/download/social-media-analytics-a-survey-of-techniques-tools-and-platforms. Acessado em: 28 abr. 2021.

BINSFELD, P. C. Desafios atuais do sistema CEP/Conep. Formação Continuada dos Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa do RS, SC, PR, Joinville, 2018.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Conheça a Conep. Brasília (DF), 2017. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/conheca_conep_comissao_nacional_etica.pdf. Acesso em: 18 de jan. de 2021.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução n° 196, de 10 de outubro de 1996. Aprova normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília, Diário Oficial da União, n. 201, p. 21082, 16 out. 1996, Seção 1, 1996.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução n. 510, de 05 de abril de 2016. Brasília, DF: CNS, 2016. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2016/Reso510.pdf. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2021.

CLIQUET, R.; AVRAMOV, D. Evolution Science and Ethics in the Third Millennium: Challenges and Choices for Humankind, Politics and the Life Sciences, London, v. 39, n. 1, p. 65-78, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2020.1787212. Acesso em: 10 maio. 2021.

GIBSON, G.; TIMLIN, A.; CURRAN, S.; WATTIS, J. The scope for qualitative methods in research and clinical trials in dementia. Age Ageing, London, v. 33, p. 422–426, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-scope-for-qualitative-methods-in-research-and-Gibson-Timlin/a9061f9e00985449531ac34d86bd0e3c20f5ae3c. Acesso em: 14 set. 2021.

LIMA, D. F.; LIMA, L. A. Perspectivas da ética em pesquisa: o repensar para o futuro do sistema normatizador brasileiro. Cadernos UniFOA, Volta Redonda, n. 45, p. 89-95, 2021. Disponível em: http://revistas.unifoa.edu.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/3335. Acesso em: 10 ago.2021.

LIMA, D. F.; LIMA, L. A; MALACARNE, V.; CRISTOFOLETTI, J. F. A ética e o controle social em pesquisa científica no Brasil. Revista Colombiana de Bioética, Bogotá, v. 16, n. 1, p. e3039, 2021b. Disponível em: https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/RCB/article/view/3039/3088. Acesso em: 12. Set. 2021.

LIMA, D. F.; LIMA, L. A; MALACARNE, V.; CRISTOFOLETTI, J. F. O lugar do representante do controle social nos comitês de ética em pesquisa brasileiros. Rev Bio y Der. Buenos Aires, v. 52, p. 253-264, 2021a. Disponível em: https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/RBD/article/view/32048. Acesso em: 12. Set. 2021.

PATHAK, V.; JENA, B.; KALRA, S. Qualitative research. Perspect Clin Res. Rockville Pike, v. 4, n. 3, p. 192. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757586/. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2021.

PLONER, K. S.; MICHELS, L. R. F.; SCHLINDWEIN, L. M.; GUARESCHI, P. A. (org). Ética e paradigmas na psicologia social. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein de Pesquisas Sociais, 2008. Disponível em: https://static.scielo.org/scielobooks/qfx4x/pdf/ploner-9788599662854.pdf. Acesso em: 23 maio. 2021.

Research. Qualitative Inquiry, Champaign, v. 10, p. 261-280. Disponível em: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.533.3263&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

SUTROP, M.; FLOREA, C. The Guidance Note for Researchers and Evaluators of Social Sciences and Humanities. Disponível em: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/fp7/89867/social-sciences-humanities_en.pdf. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2021.

VELOSO, S. C. S.; CUNHA, T. R.; GARRAFA, V. Controle ético de pesquisas cujos resultados tenham alto risco para a saúde da população. Saúde em Debate, Brasília, v. 40, n. 110, p. 234-243, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201611018. Acesso em: 14 set. 2021.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Lima, D. F. de . (2021). Ethical dilemmas related to qualitative research in the humanities and social sciences. Qualitative Research Journal , 9(22), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.33361/RPQ.2021.v.9.n.22.510